Monday, 27 June 2016

Israel and Turkey agree to normalise ties, ending rift over lethal cruise-ship raid


Israel and Turkey on Sunday reached agreement to normalise ties, senior officials from both countries said, to end a rift over the Israeli navy’s killing of 10 Turkish pro-Palestinian activists who tried to sail to the blockaded Gaza Strip in 2010.
A formal announcement on the restoration of ties and the details of the agreement were expected on Monday from Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim.
“We reached an agreement with Israel to normalise bilateral relations on Sunday in Rome,” a senior Turkish official said, describing the agreement as a “diplomatic victory” for Turkey, although Israel has not accepted to lift the Gaza blockade, one of Ankara’s three conditions for an agreement.
The once-firm allies had been quietly mending fences in trade and tourism since their leaders held a conciliatory telephone call in 2013 and negotiations have intensified over the past six months to pave the way for a mutual return of ambassadors.
Netanyahu travelled to Rome on Sunday to meet US Secretary of State John Kerry and Israeli and Turkish officials were also in the Italian capital to finalise the deal.
Israel, which had already offered its apologies - one of Ankara’s three conditions for a deal - for its lethal raid on the Mavi Marmara activist ship, agreed to pay out US$20 million to the bereaved and injured, the Israeli official said in a briefing to Israeli reporters travelling with Netanyahu.
Under the deal, Turkey will deliver humanitarian aid and other non-military products to Gaza and carry out infrastructure projects including residential buildings and a hospital in the area, the senior Turkish official said. Concrete steps will be taken to address the water and power crisis in the city.
A senior Israeli official said senior foreign ministry diplomats from both countries would separately sign parallel agreements on Tuesday.
The deal, politically touchy for both countries, could pave the way for lucrative Mediterranean gas deals and a diplomatic reprieve from Turkish troubles with next-door Syria and Europe.
The rare rapprochement in the Middle East, bitterly divided over Syria’s civil war, has been largely driven by increasing security risks with the rise of Islamic State and as both countries seek new alliances amid a polarised region.
Israel demanded that its military officers and government officials be indemnified against prosecution on war crimes allegations. The Israeli official said the money would be paid after Turkey’s parliament passed legislation on the issue.
Turkey’s Islamist-rooted President Tayyip Erdogan had cast himself as guardian of Palestinian interests and engaged Hamas, the faction that controls Gaza and is on the terrorist blacklists of Israel and Western powers.
A 2011 report commissioned by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon upheld the legality of the Gaza blockade, which Israel says is needed to stem Hamas arms smuggling. The UN inquiry also faulted Israel for its marines’ use of lethal force as they stormed the Mavi Marmara and brawled with activists on the deck.
Separate to the agreement, the Israeli official said Erdogan would instruct relevant Turkish agencies to resolve the issue of missing Israelis in the Gaza Strip. Israel says Hamas is holding the bodies of two Israeli soldiers killed in the 2014 Gaza War and believes two civilians are also missing.


Pakistan and Afghanistan are Friends, Not Foes



By Tariq Rizwan

The recent armed clashes between Afghan and Pakistani LEAs commenced due to some misunderstanding between the two sides at Torkham border (Khyber Agency) area. Now since the guns are silent, the rift proved to be a provoked act and temporary; didn’t last long. Pashtun community is living on both sides of ‘Durand Line - DL’. The community has almost common bonds supported by their tribal traditions. They cannot be separated through borders but can be strengthened through border management and smooth but legalized trade. The clashes started on Sunday, 12 June, 2016, when Pakistani side resumed construction work on the already agreed Torkham Gate as part of managing  roughly 2600 kms long porous DL and to block the entry of terrorists from across the border. Both sides held one another responsible for starting the fire. The two sides agreed on 15 June later in a meeting between Afghan Ambassador Omar Zakhilwal with Chief of General Staff Lt Gen Zubair Mehmood Hayat in Rawalpindi on de-escalation of tension followed by Afghan Foreign Office delegation’s visit to Islamabad headed by Afghan Deputy Foreign Minister. In the wake of their meeting with Pakistani side in Islamabad and agreeing to sort out all border issues through bilateral talks, a relative calm was witnessed on the border. Hundreds of goods trucks carrying perishable food items remained stranded on border for days. The clashes resulted into killing of Pakistan Major Ali Jawad Changezi and four Afghan soldiers apart from dozens of other injured on both sides.

The DL agreement was signed between Amir Abdu Rehman of Afghanistan and Sir Mortimer Durand, the British Viceroy of India in 1893.  It is a single-page agreement containing seven short articles, was signed not to interfere in one anothers’ domain. Pakistan inherited the Durand Line agreement after its independence in 1947. Though Pashtuns specially on Afghan side remained reluctant to accept DL as a permanent border between the two countries as revealed by former Afghan President Hamid Karzai recently y saying that "A line of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers". Indeed, this porous border has always served as main trade route between Islamabad and Kabul.

In 2003-4, it was for the first time that the enemies of Pakistan and Afghanistan tried to exploit the situation that DL agreement has already completed 100 years and became an obsolete one. However, the created misperception among the Afghans was cleared once for all when the original copy, where there is no mention of hundred years, was shown to them. The recent clash seemed to be an attempt to dispute the issue again, while sensitivity of time when both sides are engaged in readjustments and managing border movements on DL in Angor Adda (South Waziristan) and Torkham border (Khyber Agency) areas. It was reported that Afghan side received necessary information and guidelines from the Indian Embassies in Kabul and Islamabad to tackle the issue. Hence, it is sure hundred percent and plus that it was a provoked act on Afghan side to dispute DL and use it as tactic to reunite Afghan nation at the cost of Pak - Afghan friendship and Pashtuns unity. More importantly, the enemy was aimed to destabilize the region and delay ground work on CPEC.

Pakistani Foreign Office and Defence Minister Khwaja Asif while briefing National Assembly session on 14 June played down the recent skirmishes as war rather termed it as ‘instigated by enemies’. It was urged to improve border management and control on Pak-Afghan border after mutual understanding with Kabul. Khwaja Asif said “We have no dispute with Afghanistan. The enemies of Pakistan do not want it to progress neither do they want it to live in peace with Afghanistan and they are playing an effective role in doing just that.”

Foreign Policy adviser, Mr Sartaj Aziz also reaffirmed the government’s commitment to complete construction of a transit terminal at the Torkham border, terming it a part of the plan to “strengthen border control and regulate cross-border movements”. He said the border gate is being constructed 37 metres inside the Pakistani border as per international law.

Relations between the two countries have been subject to various complexities over the past few decades. Misunderstanding between the two sides on issues like DL, former MujahideenAfghan refugeesTalibanwater disputes, trade and it all resulted into Kabul’s tilt towards India. Afghanistan was the first country to oppose Pakistan’s membership in UN and instigated conspiracies like Pashtunistan issues and harbor terrorist groups like Al Zulfiqar and Baloch Liberation Army. Likewise Kabul has been accusing Islamabad of aiding the former Mujahideen and Taliban groups. Pakistan and Afghanistan enjoy tremendous geo strategic importance being a gateway to Central Asia and China linking both to the Indian Ocean, Arabian Sea and oil rich Middle East. Both are working together to find amicable solution to the issues.  Southern and eastern Afghanistan is predominately a Pashto-speaking region. This entire area is inhabited by the indigenous Pashtuns who belong to different Pashtun tribes and clans living on both sides of the ‘Durand Line’. Pashtuns were known historically as ethnic Afghans (and as Pathans in southern Asia) and have lived in this region for thousands of years, since at least the 1st millennium BC.

Indeed, the last one decade ushered an era of cooperation and understanding between the two sides which is pre requisite for the development of the region. In July 2010, a Memorandum of understanding (MoU) was reached between Pakistan and Afghanistan for the APTTA, observed by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The two states also signed an MoU for the construction of rail tracks in Afghanistan to connect with Pakistan Railways (PR), which has been in the making. In October 2010, the landmark APTTA agreement was signed by Pakistani Commerce Minister and Afghan Ministry of Commerce. The ceremony was attended by Richard Holbrooke, U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, and a number of foreign ambassadors, Afghan parliamentarians and senior officials. The APTTA allows Afghan trucks to drive from Pakistani Ports to Kabul via Wagah border with India
In November 2010, the two states formed a joint chamber of commerce to expand trade relations and solve the traders’ problems. In July 2012, Afghanistan and Pakistan agreed to extend APTTA to Tajikistan in what will be the first step for the establishment of a North-South trade corridor, linking Tajikistan to Pakistani ports. 

It is an open secret, that as an economic corridor, Pakistan is not acceptable to the expansionist India. India is determined to divert the trade corridor towards Iran as she has already invested heavily in Chabahar Port and Zaranj - Dilaram road network linking Iran to Central Asia via Afghanistan. But the efforts are stalled by instability in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is still 80% dependent on Pakistan, economically. India’s some projects specially construction of Dams on Kabul river are aimed to block the flow of water towards Pakistan. Moreover, several unannounced Indian consulates are operating in Afghan cities along Pakistani border without any plausible business links with the locals. It, coupled by the apprehension of RAW agent Kalbhushan Yadav from Baluchistan, has raised eyes brow of everyone what Indian presence in Afghanistan is aimed at. It is only to destabilize Pakistan’s western belt as well as undermine CPEC.
Both Pakistan and Afghanistan have suffered a lot over the last four decades. Now it is time to behave like friends not foes. We have to keep its eyes open, understand the conspiracies of India and its devil game in the region. The issue of construction of dams on River Kabul should not be aimed to divert and block water flow downside in Pakistan. Moreover, Pakistan’s initiative of managing the DL must be taken positively as it is in favour of both to counter the terrorism in the area. We are neighbors and live peacefully. We have to manage our problems bilaterally as neighbors can never afford to live under the dictates of regional and extra regional powers. Both Kabul and Tehran can also be evolved into CPEC to make it a success. This is the only way to stop US and India to exploit Pak - Afghan fragile relations to their tune under the new US policy shift to use India as policeman against and contain China.

The writer is a freelance journalist


Trump Will Take the World to the ‘State of Nature’

By Sajjad Shaukat

Trump whose political character is an amalgamation of the traits of Louis XVI, the king of France, Prince Metternich, the Austro-Hungarian emperor, Rasputin, Russian spiritualist, Germany’s rulers William II (Kaiser) and Adolf Hitler will take the world to the ‘state of nature’ when there was a war of “all against all”, if he becomes American president.

Wavering between fact and skepticism, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald J. Trump shares a number of similarities with the above mentioned famous persons like ungoverned temper, rashness, self-egoism, unrealistic idealism, lack of pragmatism, ignorance of ground realities, religious prejudice and so on.

During the early years of his reign, Louis XVI focused on religious uniformity and foreign policy. He supported the American colonies’ fight for independence. However, the policy of taking out international loans increased the debt and drove the country to near bankruptcy. Afterwards, class distinction rapidly increased in France, as more taxes were imposed on the lower class and the upper class was exempted. Hence, fiscal policies of France badly failed. When events were leading to the French Revolution of 1789, Louis XVI was busy in lock-making and hunting from the palace-window, which was his famous hobby. He also invited foreign forces to crush the French Revolution. According to historians, “stupidities” of Louis XVI resulted into French Revolution. He was executed for treason by guillotine in 1793.

Renowned historians agree that in the post-Napoleonic era, the Treaty of Chaumont which was made in March 1814 by Great Britain, Russia, Prussia and Austria…even the Vienna Settlement (1815) and various conferences of the Concert of Europe (1815-22) were used for the purpose of suppressing nationalism and liberalism everywhere in Europe and restoring the status quo…sealed the triumph of reaction and restored the pre-revolutionary conditions” [of the French Revolution]…European Powers devoted to the grand interests they had in common.”

Prince Metternich, the emperor of the Austro-Hungarian Empire did what he could by subjugating the alien peoples by employing every possible techniques of state terrorism. It was due to his influence that the principle of intervention in the internal affairs of other states was accepted in 1820 by the Congress of Troppau. The Protocol enabled Metternich to police the whole of Europe and crush liberalism and nationalism wherever it raised its head. When revolutions had broken out in Naples, Spain and Portugal and the people had forced their kings to give them liberal constitutions, it was in pursuance of this policy that Austria was able to crush the revolts in Naples and Piedmont. France also interfered in Spain.

According to Indian historian, V. D. Mahajin, “Terrorism at that stage initially appeared as the mode of activity of the small conspiratorial groups, such as student bodies and secret societies, which grew up throughout Europe in the aftermath of the post-Napoleonic restoration. These early days were exciting, since Europe still abounded (as indeed it did until 1918) with kings, emperors and tsars to be eliminated because they were using the machinery of state terrorism in suppressing the genuine aspirations of peoples such as liberty, freedom and justice…the principle of the French Revolution. The example of France became the inspiration of Europe and from there of the whole world…Metternich was the enemy of the French Revolution and all that it stood for.…Metternich had to admit that he was fighting for a lost cause, and the empire disintegrated, resulting in the independence of Italy, unification of Germany, Bulgaria and other states whose secret societies had been waging wars of liberation.”

Gregory Rasputin was a religious figure who was a mystical adviser of Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna, the wife of Czar Nicholas II of Russia. Rasputin was a notorious individual due to his rampant lascivious, compounding contempt among state officials. He became the most influential person of the imperial court and all the decisions of the government such as resistance to the demands of political and economic reforms were made by him. When Russia entered World War I, Nicholas II took command of the Russian Army, and Alexandra took responsibility for domestic policy. As per instruction of Rasputin, she dismissed ministers who were said “to be suspicious of the mad monk.” Government officials tried to warn her of Rasputin’s undue influence, but she continued to defend him. By February 1917, poor management of the government led to food shortages and famine gripped the cities. Industrial workers went on strike and people began rioting in the streets of St. Petersburg. Russia was engaged in a full civil war, with anti-tsar Bolshevik forces which culminated into the Revolution of 1917. Historians agree that besides other causes, “stupidities” of Rasputin were the major cause of the Revolution.

As regards William II and Hitler, both were famous for their pathological egotism and belief that Germany existed for their own aggrandizement. Both were fierce racists and anti-Semites. They believed in the principle of “world power or downfall.” They had a firm faith in the superiority of German race. The two leaders believed that the path to German greatness was through aggressive military actions. They started a programme of enormous armament by developing German military on modern lines. William II and Hitler became powerful rulers and acted upon an aggressive foreign policy to subjugate other nations. It was due to their unskilled diplomacy that militarization of Germany alarmed France, England and Russia. Thus, they humiliated the Germans, as their country was defeated in the World War I and World War II.

Especially, Hitler’s character and adverse circumstances in Germany helped him to come to power. The Germans were badly humiliated by the Treaty of Versailles (Peace Settlement 1919) which resulted into multiple crises, particularly unemployment in Germany. Hitler was a great orator and his techniques of propaganda helped him to influence millions of people. The Germans felt that Hitler could not only resolve their problems, but could also restore the glory of Germany in the eyes of the world. The more Hitler manipulated the injustices of the Treaty of Versailles, the more he became popular with the public.

After coming to power, like the despotic kings of France and Russia, Adolf Hitler’s internal policies were authoritarian and totalitarian. Liberty disappeared completely. The secret police-Gestapo was formed to deal with the slightest indication of opposition. He mixed politics with religious fervor and massacred several Jews in the concentration camps. Hitler and his Nazi party had planned to conquer colonies for the German people in the East and South of Europe. They must have a living space-Lebensraum, as Nazis called it.

In one way or the other, like Louis XVI and Rasputin, Donald Trump’s political character is full of “stupidities.” Besides, following William II and Hitler in the modern era, Trump promised to restore American prestige and to make America great again. Like Hitler, Trump succeeded in mobilizing the electorate of the Republican Party with promises to restore jobs and to resolve the internal problems of the US. During his emotional speeches, Trump’s body language and way of speaking were not less than those of Hitler. Nevertheless, despite the resistance from his own party, he won over his fellow candidates in the nomination race.

Regarding the propaganda techniques, one can easily witness resemblance between Trump and Hitler. In this respect, on May 31, 2016, nearly 400 pages of a US court documents revealed, “Trump University instructed employees on how to play on peoples’ emotions to get them to buy more expensive seminars for succeeding in real estate…it is our job to rekindle peoples’ motivation...to make them once again see the potential of achieving their dream…the documents unsealed in San Diego were part of a lawsuit by customers who say they were defrauded…a judge who has earned Trump’s scorn agreed with attorneys that the public had a right to know what was previously confidential.”  

It is mentionable that as part of the anti-Muslim approach, and with the support of its Western allies, American President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama deliberately created chaos in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Syria, including other Islamic countries such as Somalia, Yemen etc. where Washington was indirectly involved. If Hitler had erected concentration camps for Jews, Bush and Obama also converted these countries into concentration camps for the Muslims to obtain the illegitimate political and economic interests of the Zionist Jews and Israel. In case elected, as the US president, Donald Trump who wants to complete the unfinished agenda of Israel will continue anti-Muslim policies.

Like Hitler, Trump manipulated the terror attacks in Paris and Brussels to get the sympathies of a majority of the ordinary Americans and those of Europe, who do not have much time to go into depth-analysis and have been misguided by his emotional speeches, statements and false hopes. As part of the double game, these terror attacks were planned by the Israeli Mossad with the help of Mossad-CIA supported ISIS (ISIL or Daesh) terrorists in order to obtain several aims such as exaggeration of Islamophobia, expulsion of Muslims, especially Syrian refugees from Europe, anti-Islam movement etc., and to get the assistance of Europe, including other Western countries against Russia in connection with Syrian war and for intervention in the Islamic countries like Libya on the pattern of the Concert of Europe.

Anti-Muslim rhetoric of Trump could be judged from his own statements. While addressing a rally, Trump had called for a ban on Muslims, entering the United States. Trump’s opposition to Muslim refugees, especially from Syria is very well known. During his appearance with the National Border Patrol Council’s Green Line radio show on May 15, 2016, Trump predicted that refugees with ISIS-funded cell phones will conduct another 9/11-like terrorist attack in the US. During a GOP debate in December, 2016, he had already expressed similar thoughts by giving “Americans wake-up call about border security and to take it seriously,” elaborating that he had “no doubt, the attackers were already entering the country.”On February 14, 2016, CIA Director John Brennan warned that ISIS attacks on “U.S. soil is inevitable.”  However, these warnings were exploited by the Israeli Mossad and its affiliated CIA operatives to target the night club of Florida.
Although the presidential nominee of the Democrats Hillary Clinton is also Israeli agent, yet her criticism about contributions of election-campaign from Wall Street backers, email-scandal etc. have weakened her position. Therefore, Donald Trump suits the interests of Tel Aviv. Notably, in an interview with the Daily Mail on May 2, this year, Trump stated that Israel should continue construction of illegal settlements across the occupied West Bank.

After the shooting at the gay night club in Florida, He also criticized the US President Obama to resign, slamming him for having “disgracefully refused to even say the words “Radical Islam.” Calling on Clinton to get out of the general election race for the same reason, Trump said, “Because our leaders are weak, I said this was going to happen…we cannot afford.” Trump again remarked that he would decrease immigration from the Middle East because “since 9/11, hundreds of migrants and their children have been implicated in terrorism in the United States.” He, once again, asked for the ban of any Muslims, entering the US. On June 19, 2016, during his interview with the CBC News, he called for racial “profiling of Muslims inside the United States to combat terrorism.” In fact, like Hitler, the more Donald Trump speaks against the Muslims and the more he exaggerates Islamophobia, the more popularity he will get among the people who have been impressed by his stereotypes.

In this regard, Trump who lacks farsightedness has totally ignored American’s home-grown terrorists who are proving more dangerous than those of the ISIS. Besides, if elected, the presumptive American president Trump promised to stop immigrants from Mexico by erection of a boundary wall, while calling the Mexican immigrants “criminals” and “rapists”. Trump is creating racism between the Muslims and Christians—the black people and the white people. And if he becomes the US president, he is likely to move America towards autocracy, while American public is already protesting against the curtailment of liberty. His racist approach could also cause a civil war in the US.

It notable that in case America’s anti-Muslim, pro-Israeli and pro-Indian Donald Trump becomes American president, by following Hitler, he would erect more concentration camps by attacking more Muslim countries. While pursuing Prince Metternich, he is likely to interfere in the Muslim states, while backing the reactionary polices of some Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia. Thus, Trump will destabilize the entire Middle East, including more Islamic countries, especially Pakistan to please the fundamentalist government of the BJP and Israel, as Pakistan is the only nuclear country in the Muslim world, which irritates India, Zionist Jews and Israel. Pursuing Metternich in one way or the other, Trump will encourage every possible techniques of state terrorism, being employed by India and Israel in the occupied territories of Kashmir and Palestine. Notably, there are already governments of the religious extremists in India and Israel, so if succeeded in the forthcoming presidential election, the fundamentalist and impulsive politician Trump will not bother for dangerous implications of the US flawed strategy.

Renowned thinker of international relations, Hans Morgenthau points out that external policy of a country should be moulded in accordance “with the exigencies and circumstances of time and place” otherwise, there will be “failure of the foreign policy.” It is quite true in case of Trump who will further thwart the American foreign policy goals, because, he does not have political wisdom.
Donald Trump seems to further strengthen the alliance between the US and the West, particularly Europe against Russia, as the US-led Western countries have started a cold war against Moscow and compelled the former to follow the suit. True to his rigid approach, he has set aside the facts that one of the major causes of the disintegration of the former Soviet Union was that its greater defense expenditures exceeded to the maximum, resulting in economic crises inside the country. In this context, about a protracted war in Afghanistan, the former Russian President Gorbachev had declared it as the “bleeding wound.” While learning no lesson, the US has already been acting upon the similar policies which led to the demise of the former Russia.

There is a co-relationship of the US internal and external policies. But, like William II and Hitler, Trump is uncompromising.

After taking cognizance of the grievances of the international community, Russian President Vladimir Putin is rapidly restoring the balance of power in the world. In this respect, Moscow which also has China’s support, though Beijing does not, openly, show, is in better position than the US and its Western (NATO) allies who are also entangled in Afghanistan and the Middle East. This cold war will enhance American expenditures by deepening the US momentary problems and other internal problems which are badly affecting the Americans, while it is already been becoming difficult for Washington to maintain its military bases abroad. According to a recent report, America is near military collapse. However, while speaking in the language of William II and Hitler-world power or downfall, Trump who lacks pragmatism would expedite the disintegration of America and the European Union (EU) like the former Russia.

It is of particular attention that on June 24, 2016, Britain has voted to leave the EU, compelling the British Prime Minister David Cameron to resign. UK itself could now break apart, with the leader of Scotland, where nearly two-thirds of voters wanted to stay in the EU, saying a new referendum on independence from the rest of Britain was highly likely. President Obama who was insisting upon London to keep aligned with the EU is trying to limit the fallout from Britain’s separation from the EU, which “threatens to harm the U.S. economic recovery and distract U.S. allies from global security issues”, as he said on June 24. 2016. On the same day, Donald Trump stated, British voters just shattered political convention in a stunning repudiation of the ruling establishment in a referendum…in November, the American people will have the chance to re-declare their independence. Americans will have a chance to vote for trade, immigration and foreign policies that put our citizens first…people want to see borders. They don’t necessarily want people pouring into their country that they don’t know who they are and where they come from.”

Nonetheless, it will be misfortune of the US and other Western countries, including the whole world, if Trump becomes American president, as his personality contains the qualities of Louis XVI, Metternich, Rasputin, William II and Hitler who brought about destruction not only for their own countries, but also for Europe and other regions. Enigmatic, confused, emotional and religious extremist Donald Trump will cause a major nuclear war between Russia and the US-led West in wake of the unresolved issue of Syria. Most probably, he will divide the international community on religious lines, culminating into ‘clash of civilization’ in the sense of Huntington.  Any major war or such a clash will take the US and Europe and the entire world to the era—from 1511 to 1648 when Europe witnessed a prolonged arena of barbarism, religious bigotry and intolerance, resulting into beastly violence, and the Treaty of Westphalia was concluded in 1648 in order to maintain the nation-state system whose basic purpose was to honor the dignity of human beings. 

On May 21, 2016, Kevin Barret, while giving a wake-up call to the Americans, wrote on the Veterans Today, “Donald Trump’s terror hysteria, combined with the ever-growing terrorist attacks around the world means that a dark future awaits America in case the presumptive GOP nominee becomes president.”

Returning to our earlier discussion, if Donald Trump becomes the US president, he will take the world to the ‘state of nature’ when there was a war of “all against all” in the sense of Thomas Hobbes.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic_pak@hotmail.com
Courtesy Veterans Today


Sunday, 26 June 2016

India’s Intolerance of Minorities and Anti-Pakistan Moves

By Sajjad Shaukat

India which apparently, claims to be the largest democracy, acting upon the principles of liberalism and secularism has broken all the records of violence, genocide and massacre perpetrated on various ethnic and religious groups, entailing the community of its own lower castes.

Taking note of the growing intolerance and plight of minorities in India on June 7, this year, Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission of the US Congress examined the current state of human rights in India, challenges to fundamental freedoms and opportunities for advancement.

The report said, “Despite Constitutional provisions…abolishing the legal existence of untouchable or Dalit castes, the caste system remains deeply ingrained within Indian society, leading to ongoing discrimination. Dalit communities, which make up a quarter of India’s population, are disproportionately at risk of suffering from major human rights concern in India.”

It further wrote, “Religious minorities also face growing challenges. According to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom’s most recent report, “In 2015, religious tolerance deteriorated and religious freedom violations increased in India. Minority communities, especially Christians, Muslims, and Sikhs experienced numerous incidents of intimidation, harassment, and violence, largely at the hands of Hindu nationalist groups…these actions, coupled with perceived crackdowns on groups or individuals critical of the Indian government, have many concerned that the rights to freedom of speech and freedom of association are being increasingly curtailed.”

In fact, since the leader of the ruling party BJP Narendra Modi became Prime Minister of India, various developments like unprecedented rise of Hindu extremism, persecution of minorities even of lower cast-Hindus, forced conversions of other religious minorities into Hindus, ban on beef and cow slaughter, inclusion of Hindu religious books in curriculum, creation of war-like situation with Pakistan etc. clearly show that encouraged by the Hindu fundamentalist outfits such as BJP, RSS VHP, Bajrang Dal and Shiv Sena including other similar parties have been promoting religious and ethnic chauvinism in India by propagating ideology of Hindutva (Hindu nationalism). Especially, assaults on Christians and Muslims including their places of worships and property have been intensified by the fanatic Hindu mobs.

India is vocal advocate of secularism, but nowhere else in the world secularism was so blatantly betrayed. Moulana Azad had once remarked that communal frenzy would disappear when India assumes her destiny. In so-called secular India, Moulana Azad’s hopes and aspirations have gone for good due to the bullying politics of BJP/RSS goons.

Hindu fundamentalism is on rise and influencing the India society to the dungeon of destruction. The hate campaign unleashed by the fundamentalist forces is keeping the minority group in India wholly pre-occupied with defending their basic human rights and cultural identities.

Plight of all the minorities in India—bracing maltreatment, regression and brutalities at the hands of extremists in India has exposed the true face of so-called secular and democratic India.

Showing fraught and fraud of the Indian judicial system, recent verdict by Indian special court over Gulberg, Ahmedabad Gujarat incident is sham—an eye wash to give a face saving space to the Prime Minister Modi during his interaction with USA legislature, during his recent visit to the US.

Instances of Hinduized police and the biased judiciary is related to many cases such as Gujarat pogroms, Sikh riots, violence against Christians, Dalits and other minorities whose cases are still unregistered-pending or  unheard, while in many cases culprits have been exonerated.

As regards the rise of Hindu extremism, RSS philosophy and politics prevail over the country in wake of rise of religious extremism against the Muslims. New Delhi has availed this golden opportunity, particularly not only in persecution of Indian Muslims, but also against Pakistan.

Here questions arises that when the US and other Western countries are intolerant and abhorrent of the terrorist outfits like ISIS (Daesh) etc. due to their extremists practices and barbarity to humanity, then why Hindu fundamentalist groups like RSS, including Hindu extremist activist Modi who is involved in ethnic cleansing of Muslim minority, being accorded a red carpet or cardinal’s treatment in America. However, it shows double standards of the rulers of the US and some other Western countries who are silent over Hindu terrorism.  

Particularly, America has forgotten previous US ban on Modi regarding his visit to the US, while, before taking oath as PM, he was a persona non grata in the United States. In these terms, this contradiction displays American hypocrisy, as now Modi has become “darling of the US and even of other Western countries which have totally ignored Modi’s encouragement to Hindu terrorism. 

Under Modi rule, as part of anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan approach, New Delhi accelerated unprovoked firing at the Line of Control in Kashmir and Working Boundary across Pak-Indian border. While, in the recent months, extremists Hindus and other fundamentalist groups intensified assaults on the Muslims and Pakistani artists, famous literary persons—members of the cricket boards etc. Taking note of maltreatment of minorities by the fanatic Hindus, in the recent past, more than 200 Indian writers, authors, scientists, artists, filmmakers, film-stars etc. decided to return their national awards in protest to rising Hindu extremism, while more than 100 persons have returned their rewards. Former Indian military personnel have also started returning their medals, criticizing the policies of the BJP government.

As regards Indian anti-Pakistan moves, Daily Times wrote on June 18, 2016, “India has rejected 17,000 visa applications of Pakistani nationals this year. Indian High Commissioner in Pakistan Gautam Bambawale has contacted the Indian Home Ministry in New Delhi to know the reasons for visa refusal to such a big number of Pakistanis who wanted to meet their relatives in India. The Indian government has rejected 53 percent of visa applications this year so far. The ratio of applications rejected in 2014 and 2015 had been 24 percent and 17 percent, respectively. It is pertinent to mention that Pakistan signed an agreement with India in 2012 to relax visa conditions and boost bilateral ties. However, the Indian government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has shown a complete disregard for this agreement.”

Besides, Pakistan has become hub of cross frontier proxies and the role of New Delhi has become naked after the arrest of Kulbhushan Yadav, on March 24, 2016. Yadav openly admitted that he was the serving agent of Indian secret agency RAW in Balochistan province, and during his stay, he contacted various Baloch separatist leaders and insurgents, including Dr Allah Nazar Baloch, to execute the task to damage the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor project (CPEC).

In this context, while addressing a joint press conference with Federal Minister for Information Pervaiz Rasheed, Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Lt. Gen. Asim Saleem Bajwa disclosed on March 29, 2016 that Yadav was an active officer of the Indian Navy prior to his joining RAW. He also served as a scrap dealer and had a jewelry business in Chahbahar, Iran, after he joined RAW in 2013.

In a video, during the press conference, Yadav confessed that he spied for India and was assigned with the task to create unrest in Karachi and Balolchitan—to destabilise Pakistan and to target the Gwadar Port. Yadav also disclosed that he was funding Baloch separatists along with other terrorists—he was captured, while heading Iran.

Although in the past too, various agents of Indian secret agency RAW were arrested in Pakistan, yet the case of Kulbushan Yadav has exposed the real face of India’s terror.

The fact of the matter is that admission of the Indian spies, especially of Kulbushan Yadav clearly proved that Indian RAW has a well-organized espionage system in Pakistan.

In this connection, RAW with the assistance of some external entities, particularly Israeli Mossad have well-established its espionage network in Afghanistan, and besides backing other similar terrorist groups, it has been supporting Afghanistan-based Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) which has claimed responsibility for several terror attacks inside Pakistan.

With the tactical backing of CIA and Mossad, RAW have also been assisting the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA)  and other separatist outfits and Jundollah (God’s soldiers) which have committed various subversive acts in the province of Balochistan—abductions and killings of several nationals of China and Iran. These agencies are also weakening Pakistan, because it is the only nuclear country in the Islamic World.

It is mentionable that Pakistan considers that peace in Afghanistan is a guarantee of peace in Pakistan, therefore, has been striving for the same in utter sincerity. Enemies of Afghanistan and Pakistan—India and the US do not want to see the peace and prosperity in the region. Sadly, Pakistan’s dominant role in Afghanistan’s peace process under the Quadrilateral Coordination Group (QCG) has been sabotaged by the ill-wishers. Killing of the Taliban leader Mullah Akhtar Mansur by the CIA-operated drone attack in Balochistan has badly derailed Afghan dialogue process and violence is likely to surge in Afghanistan. It seems that America is playing double game to pressurize Islamabad to bring Afghan Taliban either for the dialogue or to take action against them. US, India and Israel have built a hostile nexus to damage the interests of Pakistan and China who want regional stability.
Nevertheless, in order to discourage Modi-led extremist policies, all such atrocities including indifferences to other minorities, human rights etc. and New Delhi’s strategy to destabilize Pakistan by sponsoring terrorism-related activities must be thoroughly debated in the regional and international media. And the US-led Western countries must take serious notice of the BJB-led government in this respect. Otherwise, extremist regime of Modi will continue encouraging the fundamentalist Hindu groups in targeting the minorities in wake of Indian anti-Pakistan moves which could also destabilize the entire region, and thus will jeopardize the interests of America and its Western allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as there is co-relationship of stability in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Particularly, the US must also abandon its dual strategy in relation to Islamabad.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com


Has the Count Down Started?


BY SOHAIL PARWAZ
Ask not for whom the bell tolls
On May 6, this year, in an emotive moment, Obama embraced 79-year-old Shigeaki Mori, who survived the inhuman and first ever nuclear attack as an eight years old innocent child.  At the occasion Obama said everything about ethics and humanity but couldn’t pick up the guts to extend an apology because that needs courage and a character. This pompous and arrogant side of US is not something new. Dig out the history and there is not a single incident where one will find them extending apology over their glaring mistakes, wrong doings and shameful acts, may that be dropping atom bombs on innocent people, killing Kongs in Vietnam, brutality and war crimes against the Iraqis, ruthless murder of Afghans or killing more innocents and just 4% of the criminals in drone strikes in FATA. Who can forget about that famous blood bath given by the American drones thus killing 18 harmless civilians in Damadola? This all comes to one’s mind when the American president suddenly forgetting all the efforts, sacrifices and gigantic contribution made by Pakistan in GWOT, turned indifferent and while standing beside a fanatic demanded from Pakistan to punish Pathankot and Mumbai attacks’ perpetrators but the most alarming for war on terror’s alley was, sanctioning to India the status of ‘major defence partner.
Pakistan is shocked and bamboozled not over forging of this suspicious alliance but over America’s traditional selfish attitude which is not understood. Finally, it has forced Pakistan to seriously start thinking about realigning its relations with America. Despite the partner’s giving company for 36 holes to a golfer, if is still treated as a caddy then what’s the fun in wasting time? It’s evident through Pakistan’s behaviour after the recent drone strike against the Taliban Chief that the country’s high ups are of the view that, ‘enough is enough’. The summoning of American ambassador by the army chief of a country should not be taken lightly. The US envoys don’t pay heed to even the governments, while in Pakistan this precedence is quite rare.
It is very unfortunate that Pakistan who dedicatedly fought the GWOT right in the face of it was never appreciated for its noteworthy contribution and great sacrifices in terms of human life, collateral damage and economic losses during the last fifteen years, as a frontline state. It is a globally known fact that Pakistan’s economy suffered huge losses, in terms of exports, foreign investment, privatization and industrial production, due to turmoil in Afghanistan. Even now, Pakistan’s national economy is exclusively suffering a loss of roughly $10 billion annually as fallout of the war against terror, which has displaced thousands of people. Pakistan did all what it could do to keep the world safe but what it has got in return? During thirteen years about 423 drone attacks were carried out in a war alley’s air space, killing three thousand seven hundred and seventy five innocents. Pakistan is the only country who is facing the music of terrorism all by itself. No one can deny the sacrifices. So far, roughly well over two thousand Pakistani army officers and soldiers have been killed in the fighting which includes half a dozen of star studded generals as martyrs, too.
If, after such toll Pakistan has to listen to the useless and illogical warnings then the only choice left with us is to part our ways. Our policy makers should be sane enough to sense and smell the shift in American foreign policy and probably they have sniffed it. The recent bitter reactions by the foreign office reps, interior minister and the Army Chief’s blunt warnings seem to be an outcome of that anger.
Before showing eyes to Pakistan, the US should remember those days when the war against the Soviets was won with the help of Pakistan and surely by Afghans. “At the moment, Russia is too weak and unstable to exert any serious influence on the CARs but who knows when the time takes an abrupt turn? If one thing was in the US’s favour in the past, why can’t it be in Russia’s favour in the near future? If the US does not take much time in naming their friends (Pakistan and Afghans) as foes today, who stops the sons of the soil from joining hands with their once enemy Russia again?”
Why must the US forget that time can’t change the strategic importance of a country like Pakistan? It’s a boulder balancing on the tip of a rock. We all know the horrific outcome of disturbing that boulder. May be not a single person from the village down in the valley survives to narrate the wrath. It’s high time for the US to keep few facts in mind before chanting the mantra to do more:
·         Unfortunately, the stick and carrot policy won’t work anymore. Pakistan is no more a caddy and you won’t find anyone to help you in case your ball lands in rough this time. The fact is that the Indians aren’t a part of this golf course.
·         We all know that what all India and US will get out of recent defense pact which is going to allow both the countries to jointly use the assets against their enemies. Everyone knows who the enemy is now. However, US must do away with this narcissistic approach and must look back and see what all Pakistan has done in war on terror as the US’s partner. It was a bad decision by some ignorant to be the part of this GWOT but someone in a position now, may go against that and makes a reimburse attempt.
·         It would be nothing more than day dreaming if Americans are expecting peace in the region without involving Afghan Taliban and while involving India in Afghanistan. It would be a beginning of a journey back to the 80s. They must remember that no harm could ever be done to the genuine Taliban of Afghanistan. They are sane and sons of the soil and without involving them in any parleys, peace in Afghanistan can never prevail or prosper.
·         A common Pakistani has started realizing that the latest forming up of a league by the Americans, Indians, Afghanistan and Iran is merely to thwart CPEC and bring Pakistan on knees. This one eyed justice will only cause frustration and hate for America and the West among a common Pakistani and what all so called friendly gestures being displayed by the US embassy will go for six.
·         Obama did remember to stand with India against terrorists groups allegedly basing in Pakistan but where does his morality stand in case of RSS terrorists burning a train of innocent passengers, nabbing of a serving Indian officer in Pakistan with his pants down and attack on Pakistani forces and innocent citizens from the Afghan soil? I am sure the drones are well aware about the locations of the terrorists on the Afghan soil too? Hope he knew about the fanatic of the gentleman whom he received as the state guest?
·         And lastly that Pakistan is genuinely a nuclear state and any thought of destabilising it by any quarter would be sheer insane. Never forget about that boulder hinging on a rock’s tip. Americans are in a habit of carrying out adventures and eventually turning them into misadventures as in the case of Iraq and Afghanistan.
In case of another miscalculation or misadventure, probably no one will live to extend an apology. I don’t know about the policy makers at the helm of the affairs in Pakistan but in my humble opinion the countdown for Pakistan has already started.
Sohail Parwaz is a bilingual columnist, playwright and a media strategist. He has authored a predictive fiction titled ‘The Cornered Rogue.’ He can be followed at Twitter @penpricker

Thursday, 23 June 2016

Is the Rape ‘Phenomena’ a New Trend in the Indian Military?



By:       Aasef Chauhdry

According to the Wikipedia rape is the fourth most common crime against Indian women. According to the National Crime Record Bureau 2013 annual report, 24,923 rape cases were reported across India in 2012. Out of these, 24,470 were committed by someone known to the victim (98% of the cases). Imagine what would be the state of affair now, when from every nook and corner of India, voice about rape cases is heard every now and then. The National Crime Records Bureau of India suggests a reported rape rate of 2 per 100,000 people, much lower than reported rape incidence rate statistics for many nations tracked by the United Nations. However, the fact is otherwise, as the majority of rape cases in India, as elsewhere in the world, are never reported. According to 2012 statistics, New Delhi has the highest raw number of rape reports among Indian cities, while Jabalpur has the highest per capita rate of rape reports. Several rape cases in India received widespread media attention and triggered protests since 2012. This led the Government of India to reform its penal code for crimes of rape and sexual assault.
The alarming issue is the penetration of sexually perverted elements in the armed forces’ files and ranks specifically and civil society generally. It has created a lot of panic among the peaceful citizens who are feeling totally insecure. The raping the women publicly, at parks, while travelling in buses, in army units has become a common practice since last one decade. Even the peaceful members of Indian society and especially youth have started raising their voice against this inhumanity. The JNU students union president Kanhaiya Kumar, few weeks back, while talking about the BJP’s youth wing filing a police complaint over his alleged defiance of bail conditions by making “anti-national” statements, said, “No matter how much you try to stop us, we will speak up against human rights violations. We will raise our voice against AFSPA. While we have a lot of respect for our soldiers, we will still talk about the fact that in Kashmir women are raped by security personnel”.
The Indian authorities encouraged their troops in Kashmir and hardly took any action against the filthy monsters who were involved in the raping of innocent and helpless Kashmiri women. The one well-publicized case was of a young bride, Mubina Ghani, who was detained and raped by BSF soldiers while she was traveling from the wedding to her husband’s home in May 1990. Her aunt was also raped. The authorities ordered the police to conduct an inquiry. Although the inquiry concluded that the women had been raped but the security forces were never prosecuted. Then there is the famous case of an air force officer Anjali Gupta, who filed a case in February 2005, against three of her superiors at a police station in Bangalore. The police refused to take any action. Anjali Gupta later approached the Karnataka High Court, nevertheless, surprisingly; the general court martial (GCM) proceedings against her were initiated. She was mentally tortured, pressurized, placed under house arrest. Later, Anjali Gupta was dismissed from service in 2005 after a five-member General Court Martial (GCM) jury convicted her of misappropriating funds, insubordination and failure to report for duty. On 11 September 2011, Anjali Gupta was found hanging at a relative’s home in Bhopal as it was expected and feared.
In November last year, a senior Group Captain of the Indian Air Force (IAF) posted in the crucial Eastern Command that looks at China, was removed from his current charge for allegedly harassing two women, one of them being the wife of a fellow officer. Sources claimed that IAF Headquarters received complaints from at least two women who alleged that the officer had harassed them. A court of Inquiry has been ordered. This is not first time allegations of harassment have been made against serving officers. The forces have a zero tolerance policy in dealing with cases of harassment and misbehavior. And, in the past officers have been sacked and in some cases even jailed for such offences.
Again in October last year, a 26-year-old Captain of Signal Corps, posted at the Alwar military station in Rajasthan, who was a prominent part of the first-ever Indian Army women officers’ contingent that showcased ‘Naari Shakti’ at Raj path in 2015 Republic Day parade also alleged sexual harassment by her senior and filed a sexual harassment complaint against none other than the Commanding Officer of her unit. A scanned copy of the letter written by her father said that while the army sat on her complaint for nearly two months, the accused was posted to a much larger commanding unit. Disappointed by the way her complaint was handled by the authorities, the father of the officer wrote an emotional appeal to Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar to look into the matter. “If this is the way the Indian Army treats its daughters, I am not sure if any parent will ever send their daughters to the Army,” he wrote.
The most recent case is of one star general of the Indian army who was posted as Indian Defence Attaché in Kabul. Brigadier SK Narain has reportedly been expelled from Afghanistan over charges of raping an Afghan girl. Brigadier SK Narain was posted as defence attaché in the Indian Embassy in Kabul. The Afghan girl he raped had reportedly approached the Indian Embassy earlier to obtain a scholarship. She was later raped on the premises. For any human it is a heinous crime, however, the shameless Afghan government may take as an honour as they are trying to please the Indians without any reason. That’s why no criminal proceedings have been initiated against the accused Indian official and he was merely expelled from the country immediately. A uniformed rape was another story on the home front when a few weeks ago, three Indian Army soldiers raped an Indian girl in a moving train.
It seriously looks as if the Indian military circles have serious psychological disorders which need to be addressed immediately and at national level. Unfortunately that seems to be impossible at least during fanatic Modi regime.